Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:[November] Rorqual Changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
David Mandrake wrote: I had a big reply written out to your post, but the forums won't let me post it. But I think you need to look at the Rorqual as not a big mining barge, but as a capital, and compare it to those. I also think you need to ch...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2016.10.06 04:55:34
|
2. Sticky:[November] Rorqual Changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Quote: +140% Local shield booster repair amount -60% Local shield booster duration -75% Remote shield booster duration and cap use +120% Remote shield booster optimal and falloff range Just keep calm and don't panic for a moment: let's focus ...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2016.10.05 19:31:49
|
3. Sticky:[New Structures] Condensed thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lim Hiaret wrote: CCP Ytterbium wrote: Citadels in wormhole spaces do not benefit from asset safety. All items are lost when the structure is destroyed there. I'm fine with the term destroyed, but don't let it drop as loot. Otherw...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2015.10.29 10:00:51
|
4. Sticky:[New Structures] Condensed thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I have a question about anchoring not answered yet in a previous thread: From the Siege V2 blog, anchoring: Quote: The structure goes into a 24 hour invulnerability timer. No damage can be done during that time and the owner cannot cancel thi...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2015.10.28 16:43:40
|
5. Sticky:[New structures] Mooring and docking features - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Not sure if this is the right topic to ask this, but it could fit into any new structure related. From the Siege V2 blog, anchoring: Quote: The structure goes into a 24 hour invulnerability timer. No damage can be done during that time and th...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2015.10.26 17:59:52
|
6. is this tolerated by CCP ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I asked about this in a petition a few weeks ago. They told me that creating 2-3 tnrowaway accounts per year is okay.
- by Dutow Sa - at 2014.09.04 08:19:00
|
7. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Dutow Sa wrote: To me, it's very clear from that document Yes, hindsight is 20/20. But remember also that this was in an discussion with the VP of Sales, who may not even play the game at all. And again, he explicit...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2014.08.20 22:33:00
|
8. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Deka Ekato wrote: CCP, - Can you please clarify that one of the reasons that Somer was punnished for was for RMT? - What about CCP's involement in all of this? I just feel that punnishing Somer is simply a start to fixing this SomerGate d...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2014.08.20 22:23:00
|
9. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Enaris Kerle wrote: Dutow Sa wrote: Based on the document published by Somer, he did run the same promotion, OR he published another document, not the one sent to you. What his proposal states: Quote: Blink provides no extra ISK or bonu...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2014.08.20 22:13:00
|
10. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Manifest wrote: AkJon Ferguson wrote: *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal. "Second, SOMER Blink advertised the promotion as being Gǣapproved by CCP.Gǥ But SOMER Blink never had permission from CCP to make such a s...
- by Dutow Sa - at 2014.08.20 22:01:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |